The bourgeoisie and the proletariat cannot disappear by communist revolutions, no,
because the communist revolution is by the same people. The Czar ruled Russia; he ruled
it through the left hemisphere of the mind. Then he was replaced by Lenin who was of
the same type. Then Lenin was replaced by Stalin who was even more of the same type.
The revolution is false because deep down the same type of people are ruling -- the ruler
and the ruled mean the same, and the ruled are those of the right-sided hemisphere. So
whatsoever you do in the outside world makes no difference really, it is superficial.
The same applies to men and women. Women are right-hemisphere people, men are lefthemisphered.
Men have ruled women for centuries. Now a few women are revolting but
the amazing thing is that these are the same type of women. In fact they are just like men
-- rational, argumentative, Aristotelian. It is possible that one day, just as the communist
revolution has succeeded in Russia and China, somewhere, maybe in America, women
can succeed and overthrow men. But by the time the women succeed, the women will no
more be women, they will have become left-hemisphered. Because to fight, one has to be
calculative, and to fight with men you have to be like men: aggressive. That very
aggressiveness is shown all over the world in women's liberation. Women who have
become part of that liberation movement are very aggressive, they are losing all grace, all
that comes out of intuition. Because if you have to fight with men you have to learn the
same trick; if you have to fight with men, you have to fight with the same techniques.
Fighting with anybody is very dangerous because you become like your enemy. That is
one of the greatest problems of humanity. Once you fight with somebody, by and by you
have to use the same technique and the same way. Then the enemy may be defeated but
by the time he is defeated you have become your own enemy. Stalin is more Czar-like
than any Czar, more violent than any Czar. Of course it has to be so: to throw Czars, very
violent people are needed, more violent than the Czar himself. Only they will become the
revolutionaries, will come out on top. By the time they reach there they have become
Czars themselves, and the society continues on the same way. Just superficial things
change, deep down the same conflict remains.
The conflict is in man. Unless it is resolved there, it cannot be resolved anywhere else.
The politics is within you; it is between the two parts of the mind.
A very small bridge exists. If that bridge is broken through some accident, through some
physiological defect or something else, the person becomes split, the person becomes two
persons -- and the phenomenon of schizophrenia or split personality happens. If the
bridge is broken -- and the bridge is very fragile -- then you become two, you behave like
two persons. In the morning you are very loving, very beautiful; in the evening you are
very angry, absolutely different. You don't remember your morning... how can you
remember? Another mind was functioning -- and the person becomes two persons. If this
bridge is strengthened so much that the two minds disappear as two and become one, then
integration, then crystallization, arises. What George Gurdjieff used to call the
crystallization of being is nothing but these two minds becoming one, the meeting of the
male and the female within, the meeting of yin and yang, the meeting of the left and right,
the meeting of logic and illogic, the meeting of Plato and Aristotle.
If you can understand this basic bifurcation in your tree of then you can understand all the
conflict that goes on around and inside you.
because the communist revolution is by the same people. The Czar ruled Russia; he ruled
it through the left hemisphere of the mind. Then he was replaced by Lenin who was of
the same type. Then Lenin was replaced by Stalin who was even more of the same type.
The revolution is false because deep down the same type of people are ruling -- the ruler
and the ruled mean the same, and the ruled are those of the right-sided hemisphere. So
whatsoever you do in the outside world makes no difference really, it is superficial.
The same applies to men and women. Women are right-hemisphere people, men are lefthemisphered.
Men have ruled women for centuries. Now a few women are revolting but
the amazing thing is that these are the same type of women. In fact they are just like men
-- rational, argumentative, Aristotelian. It is possible that one day, just as the communist
revolution has succeeded in Russia and China, somewhere, maybe in America, women
can succeed and overthrow men. But by the time the women succeed, the women will no
more be women, they will have become left-hemisphered. Because to fight, one has to be
calculative, and to fight with men you have to be like men: aggressive. That very
aggressiveness is shown all over the world in women's liberation. Women who have
become part of that liberation movement are very aggressive, they are losing all grace, all
that comes out of intuition. Because if you have to fight with men you have to learn the
same trick; if you have to fight with men, you have to fight with the same techniques.
Fighting with anybody is very dangerous because you become like your enemy. That is
one of the greatest problems of humanity. Once you fight with somebody, by and by you
have to use the same technique and the same way. Then the enemy may be defeated but
by the time he is defeated you have become your own enemy. Stalin is more Czar-like
than any Czar, more violent than any Czar. Of course it has to be so: to throw Czars, very
violent people are needed, more violent than the Czar himself. Only they will become the
revolutionaries, will come out on top. By the time they reach there they have become
Czars themselves, and the society continues on the same way. Just superficial things
change, deep down the same conflict remains.
The conflict is in man. Unless it is resolved there, it cannot be resolved anywhere else.
The politics is within you; it is between the two parts of the mind.
A very small bridge exists. If that bridge is broken through some accident, through some
physiological defect or something else, the person becomes split, the person becomes two
persons -- and the phenomenon of schizophrenia or split personality happens. If the
bridge is broken -- and the bridge is very fragile -- then you become two, you behave like
two persons. In the morning you are very loving, very beautiful; in the evening you are
very angry, absolutely different. You don't remember your morning... how can you
remember? Another mind was functioning -- and the person becomes two persons. If this
bridge is strengthened so much that the two minds disappear as two and become one, then
integration, then crystallization, arises. What George Gurdjieff used to call the
crystallization of being is nothing but these two minds becoming one, the meeting of the
male and the female within, the meeting of yin and yang, the meeting of the left and right,
the meeting of logic and illogic, the meeting of Plato and Aristotle.
If you can understand this basic bifurcation in your tree of then you can understand all the
conflict that goes on around and inside you.
No comments:
Post a Comment